Same real, tile-streamed twin as street-level walk mode — 1.27M real building footprints on real terrain, 143,474 real street segments, 53,590 real named places, real land cover and water, real traffic navigating actual junctions — viewed from a fixed isometric angle instead of first-person, controlling a visible character instead of being the camera. Both modes are the same renderer with a different camera, so they cannot drift apart, and progress carries over between them.
The name is the Flux essays' name for the whole thesis: a legible, playable twin as the first step toward a real participatory write-layer — where flagging something broken in the model becomes a real ticket in a real institution's queue.
Standing anywhere in the twin, R files a report against that exact coordinate: a building that isn't here, a footprint that's wrong, a road that doesn't exist, a name that's wrong, or something broken in the real place. It lands in the same queue as every other message the lab receives, and a person reads it.
Once someone has actually reviewed it, the report comes back into the world as a pin every player can walk up to and read with E. That review step is deliberate — an unmoderated report is visible only to the person who filed it, because a map strangers walk through is not a place to publish unread text.
What this is not, yet: a ticket in a county system. Nothing here dispatches to Nairobi City County, KURA, or any utility — the institutional half of the thesis needs a counterparty that agrees to receive, and that does not exist today. What works end to end is the citizen-facing half: report, review, publish, and a public record of what people say is wrong with the model. That is the honest boundary, and it is where the next piece of work starts.
reviewed, in the queue — public
reviewed and dealt with — public